Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

Time for a rant? VLM changes its good for age times

26 watchers
Apr 2018
1:17pm, 16 Apr 2018
4,370 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
virginmoneylondonmarathon.com

Men's times seem to have got harder, and they've reduced the age bands to 5 year windows in the main.

Hand's up if you're affected based on this year's times in the bag and plans for the remainder of the year?
Apr 2018
1:23pm, 16 Apr 2018
4,371 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
Oops, rank should have been rant!!!
Apr 2018
1:26pm, 16 Apr 2018
67 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
at the end of the day
i think its a brilliant idea reducing the age bands ...previously you had the potential scenario of a 41 year old had to sub 3.15.....yet a 59 year old had to do a sub 3.20......5 mins for a generation gap???.....its not a lot for 18 years.....altho i,m just quoting one scenario...
Apr 2018
1:28pm, 16 Apr 2018
1,343 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Uyuni
Equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity, tis the modern way
Apr 2018
1:28pm, 16 Apr 2018
4,372 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
No argument from me about the age bandings, but given that last year a 41 year old could run 3:14 and get in, and now as a 46 year old I have to run 3:09 to get in I'm feeling personally slighted!!!
Apr 2018
1:34pm, 16 Apr 2018
205 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Lee78
Should the women’s still be classed as “Good For Age”

I think the men’s is fair enough and an additional 20 minutes to the women’s times would have been a more fair comparison!
Apr 2018
1:35pm, 16 Apr 2018
68 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
at the end of the day
just had a look at Edinburgh GFA,s......60-64 is a sub 3.30......in my dreams...lol....
Apr 2018
1:39pm, 16 Apr 2018
4,373 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
I suppose GFA should now read "qualifying times" or something similar - as a 45-49yo male you need at least a 70% WAVA marathon time to get a place, for women it is 64.8%. But it's long been the case that the female GFA times have been "easier", so that's nothing new (and not necessarily something bad either - increasing participation is good).
Apr 2018
2:11pm, 16 Apr 2018
158 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Rrunner
Agree Larkim they are more qualifying times now and appear inline with Boston.

I wonder if this will make it easier for people to get in via the ballot next year?

I'm off to work out my revised pace targets...
Apr 2018
2:14pm, 16 Apr 2018
199 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Slowkentrunner
Rrunner i'm pretty sure they'll be reducing the ballot places also.

About This Thread

Maintained by larkim
virginmoneylondonmarathon.com

Men's times see...
  • Show full description...

Related Threads

  • gfa
  • marathon
  • vlm

Report This Content

You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.



Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.










Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,522 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here