Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

Grammar pedants - help please.

95 watchers
Jan 2022
9:55pm, 6 Jan 2022
5,398 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Iron_Mum
Chris is right, and I don’t see any ambiguity. There are lots of things I say I am going to do but all I ever seem to is pay bills.

Ah, I read too quickly. In that case, you're back on my people-to-go-to-lunch-with list ;-)
Jan 2022
4:06pm, 7 Jan 2022
16,469 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
Ah good, I must have been lulled into ambiguity by I_M's response! I thought it meant bills were always paid, but I_M's apparent predilection for never allowing other people to pay the bill confused me!
Jan 2022
4:26pm, 7 Jan 2022
8,376 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Northern Exile
She sounds like an expensive date to me :-)
Jan 2022
4:27pm, 7 Jan 2022
5,400 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Iron_Mum
I have no idea tbh, can't remember the last time I actually went out for lunch... :-/
Jan 2022
12:09pm, 10 Jan 2022
16,489 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
Australia's pandemic border rules ban foreigners from entering the country if they are not either double vaccinated or have a medical exemption from having the jabs.

From bbc.co.uk

"they are not" works fine for the double vaccinated clause but not "or have a".

Is this a grammar crime? Or is there a tolerance for a verb preceding "either" to be able to be attached to one clause and not the other.

(More elegant would have been "either doubled vaccinated or in possession of..." or something along those lines, or perhaps "if they are not double vaccinated. Medical exemptions can also be granted in some cases.")
Jan 2022
12:16pm, 10 Jan 2022
14,620 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Badger
It’s horrible. “Unless they are double vaccinated or have a medical exemption” would be better, though with a vague hint that that group are the minority. Or “neither double vaccinated nor holding a medical exemption” perhaps.
Jan 2022
12:27pm, 10 Jan 2022
52,178 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
LindsD
*agrees*
Jan 2022
12:41pm, 10 Jan 2022
16,491 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
I'm glad my horror has been shared.
Jan 2022
1:04pm, 10 Jan 2022
82,669 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
swittle
[One can picture great apes at keyboards churning out such misleading text.]
Jan 2022
5:30pm, 10 Jan 2022
24,166 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Dvorak
It doesn't seem that heinous to me, but might it be a case for neither/nor?

About This Thread

Maintained by Lyra OK
  • Show full description...

Related Threads

  • advice
  • language
  • words

Report This Content

You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.



Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.










Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,530 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here