Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

RunBritain rankings

21 watchers
Jul 2024
2:26pm, 5 Jul 2024
24,978 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
But don't times round up anyway like that? I thought that was the way it should be for roundings of race times that aren't recorded to 0.x of a second?
J2R
Jul 2024
2:35pm, 5 Jul 2024
5,418 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
J2R
Race times are normally rounded properly, as far as I know. So 18:59.4 is 18:59, 18:59.5 is 19:00.
Jul 2024
2:36pm, 5 Jul 2024
24,980 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
This is in the WA technical rules:-

So assuming we're talking road races, even if the timing system reports then as .x of a second, "official" recording should only ever be rounded up to the nearest second.
Jul 2024
2:38pm, 5 Jul 2024
24,981 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
I guess it's logically because if you post 18:59.4 but want to round down, you're effectively saying you ran in 18:59 when in fact you took longer than that.
J2R
Jul 2024
3:29pm, 5 Jul 2024
5,419 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
J2R
Wow! That comes as a surprise to me, as I've never noticed this happening before. Maybe that's because the results are now being submitted with .x of a second whereas before they were not?

"I guess it's logically because if you post 18:59.4 but want to round down, you're effectively saying you ran in 18:59 when in fact you took longer than that." - Yes, but not as long as 19:00.
Jul 2024
3:49pm, 5 Jul 2024
24,982 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
I guess the "fault" is on the part of the chip timing company publishing results to the 0.1s detail. I don't think I've seen any results locally that give that level of precision, so I suppose I have to trust that they are rounding properly (who knows, they could be rounding 18:59.4 to 18:59, and no-one would ever know!)
SPR
Jul 2024
5:42pm, 5 Jul 2024
45,005 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
SPR
I've never seen tenths or lower for road.
Jul 2024
5:53pm, 5 Jul 2024
2,670 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Jen HB
Aah, the delights of rounding rules.... (I work in a lab and there are 2 exceptions: for one technique it's round up the other is round down)

Got something to say?

To join the discussion, sign in or join us.

About This Thread

Maintained by Bazoaxe
Is anyone signed up to these ?

Do you know how they work ?

I am bamboozled and have been ever ...
  • Show full description...

Related Threads

  • handicap
  • runbritain
  • wava

Report This Content

You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.



Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.










Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,433 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here