Nov 2012
11:17am, 24 Nov 2012
3,222 posts
|
The Teaboy
Perhaps if he ran with his spear out in front of him, he would have been able to create an offset shockwave and avoid the worst of the heating effects?
|
Nov 2012
12:11pm, 24 Nov 2012
3,552 posts
|
Kieren
Curses to the no-edit feature
|
Dec 2012
10:10am, 4 Dec 2012
476 posts
|
Canute
McAllister draws dramatic conclusions form only minimal evidence. However, I think it is likely that human physical capacity has steadily decreased since the invention of the wheel and subsequently, the internal combustion engine. Driving kids to school is the latest step in this downwards path.
|
Dec 2012
10:48am, 4 Dec 2012
6,203 posts
|
GordonG
OK, gonna risk looking like a numpty (no change there, then)... i don't get Fozzie's 37,000 mph reference on the previous page and all the subsequent physics analysis. where's that come from, or am i just blindly tripping over the carcass of a really obvious joke???
37 kph???
|
Dec 2012
11:20am, 4 Dec 2012
621 posts
|
Nelly
Gordon, I suspect it's an eye sight issue
K (capital) = 1,000 so K(capital)Mph = 1,000 x miles per hour whereas km (non-capital) = kilometer so kmph = kilometer per hour
|
Dec 2012
11:28am, 4 Dec 2012
3,930 posts
|
rf_fozzy
According to SI units, speed should always be m/s
But I think conventionally, kilometers per hour is designated kph.
Really, I was being facetious for the sake of comedic value, as 1000=lower case k, e.g. kilograms = kg. I'm not sure that capital K has the same meaning. It would get confused with the SI unit for temperature, which of course is the Kelvin (NOT degrees Kelvin).
For reference, 0degC=273.15K (to a close approximation). 0K is absolute zero and nothing can be colder than this - it is where all atomic vibrations stop.
|
Dec 2012
12:01pm, 4 Dec 2012
6,204 posts
|
GordonG
but it doesn't say kmph either capital or not in the article???
lol, but there are more important things in life to worry about
|
Dec 2012
12:03pm, 4 Dec 2012
3,511 posts
|
Badger
Does say KMph in the thread title though
|
Dec 2012
12:05pm, 4 Dec 2012
3,931 posts
|
rf_fozzy
I didn't read the article!
|
Dec 2012
12:06pm, 4 Dec 2012
6,999 posts
|
TRO Saracen
Reminds me of that excellent piece looking at the actual physics of santa's task on the night of 24 Dec. Payload, velocity etc.
|