Welcome To Fetcheveryone

Our awesome training log doesn't hide its best features behind a paywall. Search thousands of events, get advice, play games, measure routes, and more! Join our friendly community of runners, cyclists, and swimmers.
Click here to get started
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here

Tri swim training

2 watchers
Jun 2012
8:51am, 28 Jun 2012
4170 posts
  • 0
Bez-head
Is it better to swim train for time or lengths of pool?

30 lengths seems a lang way!! But 16-20 mins not so if you catch my drift :-)
Jul 2012
11:46am, 5 Jul 2012
183 posts
  • 0
MissTash
I dont know but im interested to know what other people think too :-) anyone?
Jul 2012
12:03pm, 5 Jul 2012
584 posts
  • 0
Tarahumara
I am just learning freestyle and started out with 16 lengths - did 22 today but it seems to take forever! Because I do tend to lose count I think I will swim for time not distance - one less thing to get my head round!
Jul 2012
12:23pm, 5 Jul 2012
6534 posts
  • 0
TRO Saracen
I wouldn;t plough up and down for as many lengths as you can at this point. It's boring, you'll lose concentration and your technique will fall apart.

Do blocks of 4 lengths (100m), rest, then another 4 etc, so the session might be 10*100m with xx secs rest. Concentrate on good form and technique each time. When the 100's feel easy start reducing the rest period, doing more of them 10 to 12 to 15 etc, or mix it up by doing 200m sets instead of 100's or a pyramid (50m/100m/200m/300m and back down) etc. Broken up like this you'll be able to knock out a 1k (40 length) or 1.5k (60 length) session much easier!

Got something to say?

To contribute to the discussion, you need to either sign in or register as a user.

About This Thread

Maintained by Bez-head
Is it better to swim train for time or lengths of pool?

30 lengths seems a lang way!! But 16-20 m...

Related Threads

lengths swim lose you'll wouldn train tend technique start sets session
Back To Top

Close