Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

More efficient running style

183 watchers
Jan 2014
3:36pm, 6 Jan 2014
851 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Canute
Cerotonia, Thanks for your comment, and FR, thanks for your feedback.

As discussed in my blog, I think the evidence shows that muscle damage is at least as important as glycogen depletion in causing slowing in the second half of a marathon, and this has not received enough attention when planning marathon training.

FR, maybe your loss of bounce was an indicator of the type of damage that Del Coso observed in his study. I would be interested to know whether your muscle strength is reduced today, but unless you did strength assessment before the race, it would be difficult to tell. Most of the studies do show a significant loss of strength that persists for several days after a marathon. (This can be shown by assessing either jump height or maximum voluntary isometric contraction).

The next question (which I will address in my next blog post) is the relative contribution of mechanical and metabolic factors to the muscle damage. It is probable that both types of factor matter.

The really big question is what training strategies are most helpful. I will address that in the subsequent blog post – but again the evidence suggests that a well-balanced marathon program includes both long slow running and sprinting.
Jan 2014
11:31pm, 18 Jan 2014
855 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Canute
bjsm.bmj.com

Transitioning to Nike Free 3.0v2 is associated with significantly increased risk of injury over a 12 week training program, compared with NikePegasus. Vibram FF is associated with non-significantly greater risk compared with Pegasus.

Injury rate: Nike Pegasus, 4/32; Nike Free 3.0v2, 12/32; VFF bikila 7/35

VFF is associated with greater calf/shin pain (expected during a 12 week transition)
Jan 2014
7:06am, 19 Jan 2014
7,435 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Boab
Goes some way to proving that the transition period to minimal footwear (if that is the goal) should be gradual and those seeking minimal running should undestand that it does not suit everyone. Sometimes people seek the minimal label more than the running itself. I speak from experience here. Running is a journey(cliche, i know) and within that a series of experiences. I've found that I appreciate that more if I think less about what is on my feet and what my feet and body are doing.

Canute, I am enjoying your blog, I look forward to the next post. :)
Jan 2014
10:34am, 19 Jan 2014
304 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
FenlandRunner
Spot on, Boab :) Until injuring my ribs the whole 'kinectic chain' has been brought into sharp focus. The whole body is required for locomotion which means to me that core work is essential.
Jan 2014
4:12pm, 20 Jan 2014
3,733 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Jhuff
Clearly it means there should be only one shoe on the planet!! THE PEGASUS ;-)
Jan 2014
10:24pm, 20 Jan 2014
856 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Canute
Jeremy,

Maybe it would be premature to award the prize to Pegasus when they did not even include HOKAs in the study ;)

More seriously, in my eyes this study is a modest addition to the accumulating body of evidence indicating that shoes do make a difference to injury risk but simplistic rules that say that everyone should go minimalist or everyone should use cushioned shoes are probably too simplistic. Furthermore, transitions are particularly risky. Unless there is a clear need to change, most runners are probably better advised to focus on getting fit rather than changing shoes (as I think Boab implied).
Jan 2014
1:02pm, 26 Jan 2014
386 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
FenlandRunner
Self analysis followed by a question!

SA: Over the years I believe my running style has changed from a pusher to a puller.

Question: When you 'push' hip extension will naturally follow. With a 'pull' am I missing out on the extra pace derived from the extension?

And BTW anybody who suggests the whole body isn't involved when running has never had a rib injury! :)
Jan 2014
2:19pm, 26 Jan 2014
858 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Canute
I think that evidence such as that from Weyandt’s famous study showing the faster runners pushdown and back harder against the ground, confirms that pushing is necessary for fast running. However, the timing of the push has to be exquisitely precise. Perhaps elite sprinters such as Usain Bolt can achieve this by conscious pushing. However for many of us, the best strategy might be focussing on the goal getting off stance quickly, without trying to consciously micro-manage the push.

As an illustration, for most of us, simply focussing visual attention on a target such as a moving tennis ball increases the chance that we will time the hit well, whereas trying to consciously control the sequence of muscle contractions produces disruptive delay.

Although it is in fact impossible for a pull to get us off the ground (that would be life lifting oneself by ones own shoe laces) the image of pulling the foot quickly towards the butt smartlly might encourage the brain to execute an automatic motor sequence that gets us airborne quickly, provided we have enough muscle power.

So the conclusion might be to use drills and strengthening exercises to create the power required to get off stance quickly but when actually running, focus of pulling the foot smartly upwards, and let the non-conscious brain organize the push.

I hope the rib pain is resolving
Jan 2014
3:03pm, 26 Jan 2014
388 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
FenlandRunner
Thanks Canute, I always value a well thought out response :)

The ribs are getting better and exceeding my estimation on progress, the 2-3 weeks seem to be slightly over estimating my exact case :)
Jan 2014
5:11pm, 26 Jan 2014
4,207 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Garfield
I ran with cracked ribs after a face plant a few years ago...initially it hurt but I got used to it. Fortunately I didn't have any races coming up so mileage wasn't high at that time.

About This Thread

Maintained by cabletow
  • Show full description...

Related Threads

  • health
  • training

Report This Content

You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.



Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.










Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,420 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here