Garmin - which one?
4 watchers
Oct 2012
12:54pm, 17 Oct 2012
4400 posts
|
Smout
Thanks for feedback folks. Almost went for it but realised the 210 intervals wasn't up to what I use on my 405 (which still has a misted up screen despite not using it other than a wee while as a watch since Thursday). Got 410 instead for £160 with HRM from amazon. |
Oct 2012
8:20am, 18 Oct 2012
3070 posts
|
Tav H
I have just bought a Garmin 10 for £80 from Run Online. It's for Chrimbo so I can't really comment on functions. I know it has "instantaneous" pace, no HRM, quite low battery life (5 or 6 hours, something like that), and 50m water resistance. It's essentially in the same mould as the 110 functions-wise.
|
Oct 2012
8:53am, 18 Oct 2012
5282 posts
|
Footpad
Just organised for my defunkt 405 to be replaced by Garmin.... not bad for £50 for a recon unit. Mine just came unglued and fell apart! I blame the Milton Keynes HM....... if anyone ran it then you will understand the weather was special!
|
|
Oct 2012
9:33am, 18 Oct 2012
5283 posts
|
Footpad
hmmm OK so it is a 305 I am replacing otherwise it is £70 for a 405 recon unit 
|
Oct 2012
10:05am, 18 Oct 2012
31 posts
|
alifrobertson
FWIW I bought the same FR410 from Amazon a couple of months ago after using weekatiepea's FR305 for 6 months whilst she was preggers. The 410 does all the same stuff the 305 does with a neater look. The touch bezel works fine for me even in wet weather, only occasionally switching screen when my jacket is soaked through, but it always records perfectly.
|
Heart Rate Analysis
See your heart rate training data from the last 12 months broken down in technicolour.
Flat as a pancake?
We've collected thousands of your reviews from events, and worked out which races give you the best chance of a fast time!
UTMOST
Beat your league rivals to gain weekly promotion. Compete at every distance from a mile to a marathon.
Marathon Prediction
We delve deeper to give you greater insights when working out your goal marathon time.