Dec 2016
4:59pm, 18 Dec 2016
107 posts
|
Brunski
Cheers guys, and yeah Baz, my heart was nicely under control, my breathing regular, but my legs were definitely feeling yesterday's efforts (and still are)
|
Dec 2016
6:10pm, 18 Dec 2016
464 posts
|
Daz Love
Yes top quality work Brunski.
I will get there one decade!! 😀😀
|
Dec 2016
7:02pm, 18 Dec 2016
108 posts
|
Brunski
I reckon you'll be there by early spring if you stick to it Daz. You've got very similar 5 & 10k times to me IIRC, so when you build your aerobic engine you'be already got the pace 😀
|
Dec 2016
7:16pm, 18 Dec 2016
23,227 posts
|
SPR
Brunski - You say TomTom behaved itself but there's very little change in the avg HR when you run the first few at 6:30 to 6:40 pace (If that's sub 70%, that's great pace), then drop to 8:30 then back to into the middle. Was the route that hilly?
|
Dec 2016
7:55pm, 18 Dec 2016
109 posts
|
Brunski
Slight incline going out, seemed like it took a while to get my HR up to 140 (hence the quick start), settled in my band of 135-145, but toward the top end (slowing when I went out the band), didn't check the pace at all. There was a total of 791ft of elevation, mainly in miles 5-6 and 8-9 I think.
Can't categorically say TomTom working (it's had its ups and downs), but effort matched the watch readings for me. The pace dropped at the end due to tiredness 5k yesterday and a double 230ft hill today.
Whether my max HR of around 205bpm is another question as I tend to race a 10k at around 155-165, and this should really be higher (I think). Maybe I've got a freaky heart??
|
Dec 2016
7:55pm, 18 Dec 2016
110 posts
|
Brunski
Slight incline going out, seemed like it took a while to get my HR up to 140 (hence the quick start), settled in my band of 135-145, but toward the top end (slowing when I went out the band), didn't check the pace at all. There was a total of 791ft of elevation, mainly in miles 5-6 and 8-9 I think.
Can't categorically say TomTom working (it's had its ups and downs), but effort matched the watch readings for me. The pace dropped at the end due to tiredness 5k yesterday and a double 230ft hill today.
Whether my max HR of around 205bpm is another question as I tend to race a 10k at around 155-165, and this should really be higher (I think). Maybe I've got a freaky heart??
|
Dec 2016
9:23pm, 18 Dec 2016
4,749 posts
|
Huntsman
Brunski I get within 4/5 beats of my max HR during a 10k.
Your HR figures don't look right to me.
|
Dec 2016
9:29pm, 18 Dec 2016
71 posts
|
glucotab
Brunski- I`m not speeding up my warm up to get the Zone. I suppose if you want to risk it, then straight in. Or do you do some other non-running HR-up method? I`d be interested to know how you go from cold to warm enough not to ping anything directly. Or are you keeping the warm up off your charts?: I have none to present so am only grateful for you have to say.
|
Dec 2016
11:08pm, 18 Dec 2016
111 posts
|
Brunski
I get close to max HR in the sprint finish but simply can't maintain it for all of a 10k. I've said before (on here I think) that I think I'm relatively soft when it comes to discomfort. Others seem able to put themselves through real stress for a period of time. Any more than 3k at over 85% of my max and I'm wanting to stop and walk.
Gluco - Nah the warm up for these is simply a few hundred yards steadier and then raise from the 110 or whatever I'm doing as a steady run up to the 140bpm.
My HR max might be way off but I think I hit threshold around the 160bpm and can't stand going much beyond that other than the last mile if I'm really trying to get a time...Others are near their max from after the first mile all the way through. Maybe I'll try and run a 5k purely at 90% plus heart rate but feel I'm likely not to complete it.
|
Dec 2016
11:19pm, 18 Dec 2016
23,236 posts
|
SPR
You don't race to HR! In a 5k your HR is likely to climb all the way through anyway. And given you have dodgy HR monitor it would be foolish even if it was generally a good idea.
That said, your numbers don't really stack up TBH.
|