The Environment Thread :-)
61 watchers
30 May
12:52pm, 30 May 2025
80 posts
|
mityellow
HappyG(rrr) wrote: Funny, everyone always raves about Octopus service! The email works quite well. G I had a poor experience with Octopus about 5 years ago by email which sounds like Chrisull's experience by phone - they simply weren't reading what I'd told them (I got others to check what I was writing by the end to make sure I was being clear as in theory it was simple!). Eventually they got it correct (it wasn't that they disagreed once they finally understood). |
7 Jun
11:17pm, 7 Jun 2025
22,944 posts
|
Chrisull
Phoned Octopus AGAIN! More helpful this time. Told me will be on going live for exporting on Monday 9th... we will see, we will see.
|
9 Jun
6:50pm, 9 Jun 2025
22,946 posts
|
Chrisull
Ok - it's up it's and live. They wanted a photo of my export amount, which I have done. So configurers (in particular @HappyG(rrr) ), what do I now need to be doing/setting up to get maximum bang for my exporting buck please? It's a GivEnergy battery and it's on a "Out going, smart export guarantee tariff" with Octopus. |
9 Jun
7:56pm, 9 Jun 2025
53,007 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
Chrisull wrote: Ok - it's up it's and live. They wanted a photo of my export amount, which I have done. So configurers (in particular @HappyG(rrr) ), what do I now need to be doing/setting up to get maximum bang for my exporting buck please? It's a GivEnergy battery and it's on a "Out going, smart export guarantee tariff" with Octopus. OK, you need to change your outgoing tariff to whichever suits you best - I'm on Flux export. 4-7pm is 27p, and same for import, I'm on flux import 2-5am 15p. Then charge battery during cheap rate and discharge during peak rate. Tada. ![]() |
10 Jun
7:52am, 10 Jun 2025
53,012 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
And I don't know if that is the best way, but given the difference between 15 and 27p is better than at any other times, it seems like it should be. Just went over last year's bills, and very roughly, ignoring £30 direct debit and roughly £25 standing charge, the actual usage is roughly £250-300 credit in summer, and £250-300 charged in winter, so it's probably net zero overall. But down from the £2,000 a year that it would have been for electricity. And that includes home charging an electric car (on cheap rate). So roughly a 6 year payback on a £12K investment? Not accurately calculated though. ![]() |
10 Jun
7:54am, 10 Jun 2025
53,013 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
And for enviro thread - net giving to the grid during 16.00 - 19.00 which is peak demand which drives use of gas turbine and other on demand generation, net contributing to the grid during daylight hours generally (though not getting paid much for it!) and generally offsetting our electricity usage to off peak 02.00 - 05.00 for charging battery and car, when base load is lowest and almost entirely non-fossil fuel generated. It's not perfect, but if every house was fitted with a battery (never mind solar), it would help to balance the grid much better. ![]() |
10 Jun
1:36pm, 10 Jun 2025
53,021 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
You can buy *way* more solar and wind plus storage capacity for £14Bn pounds and it can be online quicker, than you get with a nuclear power station. Why are Labour/UK going with nuclear? I thought Ed Miliband understood this stuff?
|
10 Jun
5:45pm, 10 Jun 2025
22,947 posts
|
Chrisull
It was already signed off, from the previous govt. They've even cleared the site. Not sure any point in cancelling it now?
|
10 Jun
5:50pm, 10 Jun 2025
53,028 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
Chrisull wrote: It was already signed off, from the previous govt. They've even cleared the site. Not sure any point in cancelling it now? Sunk cost fallacy Chris. It's literally the first one in the "how to debate well" diagram in your other thread?! ![]() No. It was bad to sign it off. The only thing worse than cancelling it, is not cancelling it and wasting more money. ![]() |
10 Jun
5:52pm, 10 Jun 2025
6,479 posts
|
K5 Gus
I've not studied how the grid is made up in any great detail, in fact barely at all. If we are to switch off coal/gas generators at some point in the future, don't we need something else, like nuclear, to fill in the gaps when the renewables don't work, eg at night when there's no wind ?? Or is there already something else to fill this gap if there's no coal/gas ? Apols if that's a newbie question ![]() |
About This Thread
Maintained by HappyG(rrr)
Hi
I've seen environment (whether emissions, power, climate change, access to countryside, whatever you think of as "environment") discussed in various threads: Politics (obviously), the Electric Car thread fetcheveryone.com/forum/electric-car-anyone-61481/ , run free's excellent "Competitive Running and Keeping The Environment Clean" fetcheveryone.com/forum/running-competitively-keeping-our-environment-clean-60907/ my own Greta Thunberg thread fetcheveryone.com/forum/greta-thunberg---jfk-for-the-climate-generation-61044/ etc. but I haven't seen a general one.
So here it is. For those interested in the science, the politics, the action for (and I'll state that for me, this is mostly pro-environment, anti-emissions, anti-pollution etc.) and the hope for the future of our planet.
Useful links posted by contributors:
rf_fozzy: This is quite a good article about how disruptive technology works too: lesswrong.com
Basically about why Kodak completely missed the boat when it came to digital cameras timkastelle.org
run free's Grand Designs example Ben Laws is a man who built his dream: granddesignsmagazine.com granddesignsmagazine.com
Carbon Commentary carboncommentary.com
I've seen environment (whether emissions, power, climate change, access to countryside, whatever you think of as "environment") discussed in various threads: Politics (obviously), the Electric Car thread fetcheveryone.com/forum/electric-car-anyone-61481/ , run free's excellent "Competitive Running and Keeping The Environment Clean" fetcheveryone.com/forum/running-competitively-keeping-our-environment-clean-60907/ my own Greta Thunberg thread fetcheveryone.com/forum/greta-thunberg---jfk-for-the-climate-generation-61044/ etc. but I haven't seen a general one.
So here it is. For those interested in the science, the politics, the action for (and I'll state that for me, this is mostly pro-environment, anti-emissions, anti-pollution etc.) and the hope for the future of our planet.
Useful links posted by contributors:
rf_fozzy: This is quite a good article about how disruptive technology works too: lesswrong.com
Basically about why Kodak completely missed the boat when it came to digital cameras timkastelle.org
run free's Grand Designs example Ben Laws is a man who built his dream: granddesignsmagazine.com granddesignsmagazine.com
Carbon Commentary carboncommentary.com
Useful Links
FE accepts no responsibility for external links. Or anything, really.- why Kodak completely missed the boat when it came to digital cameras
- rf_fozzy: This is quite a good article about how disruptive technology work
- run free's Grand Designs example Ben Laws is a man who built his dream
- Carbon Commentary carboncommentary.com
- UK ombudsman for problems with electricity or gas
Related Threads
-
Ethical choices Apr 2021
-
Electric car anyone? Jul 2025
-
Today I will consume mindfully... Jul 2025
-
Solar pv and other domestic micro-generation technologies Jun 2025
-
Reusable/collapsible water cups Oct 2024
-
Reducing single-use/disposable plastic Sep 2024
-
The Green Runners Apr 2024
-
Journey to Zero Waste Jan 2024
-
Greta Thunberg - JFK for the Climate Generation? Oct 2022
-
Preventing Food Waste Ideas Dec 2021
Report This Content
You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.
Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.