Hadd's Approach To Distance Running
1 lurker |
168 watchers
Oct 2009
3:22pm, 11 Oct 2009
52 posts
|
Those 'pacing estimates' people give are a pain in the arse since they aren't set in stone. They vary with your own fitness etc. End of the day it is ultimately a game of guesswork based on feeling and experience as to what pace you would run a certain distance to last it out and invariably involves on the fly alterations to keep yourself on track rather than being a constant anyway. As Hadd pointed out at the start of the document, conversions are messed up even further by poor training (that this training corrects) which shows up personal times that don't correlate between distances. |
Oct 2009
3:25pm, 11 Oct 2009
53 posts
|
Aye, SPR, hence my bit about training for shorter work. UC: Yes, everyone can run much faster than that. As I said, it's a question of how long they can, rather than whether they can. |
Oct 2009
3:27pm, 11 Oct 2009
54 posts
|
Oh, and Hadd's little MaxHR test (copied and pasted so the wording is out of context): Then (wearing his HRM) he was to run an all-out 800m and note the highest HR recorded on his monitor. He was to rest 2 mins and run an all-out 400m. The highest number he would see as he crossed the finish-line, we would take as his HRmax. |
Oct 2009
3:31pm, 11 Oct 2009
55 posts
|
UC: If it hurts to run at a faster pace, what we're talking about is the reason why and how to sort it. |
Oct 2009
3:33pm, 11 Oct 2009
599 posts
|
chirunner
There is a much greater sense of honesty/reality about the hadd approach which you do not seem to get with other ways that seem to suggest a hard coded formula will get you there and people wonder when it does not work where they went wrong. This way round you can check the feedback on your aerobic state and then decide how hard to push each time. |
Oct 2009
3:34pm, 11 Oct 2009
7,172 posts
|
Ultracat
I must be doing the wrong type of training
|
Oct 2009
3:38pm, 11 Oct 2009
57 posts
|
Aye, true. Like Lydiard said, you don't ever make an athlete play strict on some formula. If you do choose to stick to a program, it is up to the athelete to determine how hard they play and when they are finished on how they feel, even if the session hasn't been fullfilled and then they adjust to make it work next time. |
Oct 2009
3:39pm, 11 Oct 2009
58 posts
|
Crosspost UC: Congrats, you stumbled onto your solution ![]() |
Oct 2009
3:41pm, 11 Oct 2009
59 posts
|
Grab a HRM and join the fun ![]() Since idea is in playing in the 'comfortable' zone not breaching the LT, you'll enjoy it too. |
Oct 2009
3:44pm, 11 Oct 2009
60 posts
|
counterpartcoaching.com Good reading, can learn a lot from it. |
Related Threads
-
Furman Institute of Running and Scientific Training (F.I.R.S.T.) acolytes! Mar 2025
-
Hillscore...what is it? Aug 2023
-
Daniels Running Formula. The Definitive Wire. Jul 2023
-
'Easy Interval Method' Feb 2023
-
POSE running Oct 2020
-
Numpty Question about Plans Feb 2020
-
Mcmillan training pace calculator Oct 2019
-
What's the point of pyramids? Sep 2017
-
Maffetone Jan 2017
-
Do I have to go so slow? Oct 2015
Report This Content
You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.
Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.