Oct 2007
1:06pm, 24 Oct 2007
155 posts
|
Is ther such a thing as a precise estimate?
Surely thats a contradiction in terms.
|
Oct 2007
1:24pm, 24 Oct 2007
5,131 posts
|
Maclennane
there's a chap in accounts who offers indicative costs which are 'more indicative' than previous ones. Does this mean thery're less based on fact or a more accurate indication
|
Oct 2007
1:26pm, 24 Oct 2007
10,893 posts
|
I suppose it depends on what your precision is and if at all you even state it. Say for example you give an estimate with a precision of + or - 50 quid...
|
Oct 2007
1:33pm, 24 Oct 2007
11,156 posts
|
Hendo
In context (have gone for BB's suggestion);
"We believe that these mechanisms have allowed us to best estimate the business mileage..."
|
Oct 2007
1:35pm, 24 Oct 2007
575 posts
|
Bree
Is that not a split infinitive, Hendo?
|
Oct 2007
1:37pm, 24 Oct 2007
4,721 posts
|
Stumpy
Hendo, shouldn't that be 'better estimate' as said before?
better is being used as an adverb there, surely, not an adjective, so best is not appropriate.
and even if it were being used as an adjective, surely the situation requires a comparative (i.e. better) not a superlative (best)?
|
Oct 2007
1:38pm, 24 Oct 2007
4,722 posts
|
Stumpy
and breeze, yes it is! (it niggled me from the first time he typed the sentence)
however, tintyweb sources inform me that split infinitives are no longer the horrific crime that they once were. I don't know what the world is coming to
|
Oct 2007
1:39pm, 24 Oct 2007
10,896 posts
|
"We believe that these mechanisms have allowed us to arrive at the best estimate for business mileage..."
|
Oct 2007
1:41pm, 24 Oct 2007
318 posts
|
Snapstinget
"We believe that these mechanisms have enabled us to arrive at the best estimate for (the) business mileage..."
"allow" = "permission"; mechanisms don't give permission
|
Oct 2007
1:42pm, 24 Oct 2007
10,897 posts
|
Well spotted Snaps
|