Ridiculous WAVAs in profiles based on 100m sprint times rounded down.
6 watchers
Apr 2013
12:53pm, 15 Apr 2013
6,476 posts
|
The Teaboy
What if we have someone on Fetch who actually legitimately does a 100%+ WAVA. This is perfectly feasible with age-group records, particularly female ones, since WAVA is not actually calculated off the world best time, but (I believe) the seventh best. There is a FV65 who runs at about 100% WAVA at the LFOTM5k races.
|
Jul 2016
6:03pm, 24 Jul 2016
252 posts
|
CharlieP
On a related note, what are the "rules" for rounding results timed to the decisecond? Always round up, always round down, or round to the nearest? I ran a recent 5K in 21:00.2 - should that be 21:01 or 21:00?
|
Jul 2016
6:09pm, 24 Jul 2016
253 posts
|
CharlieP
(I'm assuming always round up, on the basis that you can't claim to have run faster than you actually have!)
|
Related Threads
-
Sprint Triathlon Jul 2011
-
Track & Field Fetchies Oct 2023
-
Can you run as fast as kipchoge, for 400m? Sep 2023
-
100m tips for distance runner? May 2019
-
breaking the 2min barrier for the 800m Aug 2016
-
Open masters/veterans track meets? Jul 2016
-
How to train for a track 6 hour race Jan 2013
-
How do sprinters and middle distance runners train? Jun 2012
-
How to pace track races? (1500m in this case) Mar 2012
-
WAVA and ranking tables Mar 2023