Welcome To Fetcheveryone

Our awesome training log doesn't hide its best features behind a paywall. Search thousands of events, get advice, play games, measure routes, and more! Join our friendly community of runners, cyclists, and swimmers.
Click here to get started
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here

Marathons bad for you?

4 watchers
Dec 2011
5:59am, 8 Dec 2011
37981 posts
  • 0
plodding hippo
Its just such a shame that article is the in BMJ Saint

Still love it though
Dec 2011
1:13pm, 8 Dec 2011
5132 posts
  • 0
The_Saint
Even though I have a BMJ Login, isn't this one open access?
Dec 2011
1:16pm, 8 Dec 2011
37986 posts
  • 0
plodding hippo
Oh, Im sure it is open access saint
its just the BMJ impact factor aint much more than toilet paper
:)
Dec 2011
1:16pm, 8 Dec 2011
37987 posts
  • 0
plodding hippo
The lancet should have snapped this one up
Dec 2011
1:26pm, 8 Dec 2011
17660 posts
  • 0
A Frobester in a Pear Tree
Are we expecting the news media, apart from possibly New Scientist, to provide empirical evidence routinely? Surely what every newspaper puts across, unless confirmed elsewhere, should be taken with a pinch of salt?

Got something to say?

To contribute to the discussion, you need to either sign in or register as a user.

About This Thread

Maintained by M62 Santa
It's certainly food for thought.

bbc.co.uk
Back To Top

Close