Welcome To Fetcheveryone

Our awesome training log doesn't hide its best features behind a paywall. Search thousands of events, get advice, play games, measure routes, and more! Join our friendly community of runners, cyclists, and swimmers.
Click here to get started
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here

Interesting article regarding footwear..

5 watchers
Jul 2014
6:55pm, 29 Jul 2014
1225 posts
  • 0
RunningInCircles
1879 miles out of my Leadvilles. A bit disappointed not to get to 2000 :-p But they were completely worn through at the ball of my foot. :-)

Got a few miles to go to test Xero's 5000 mile warranty :-)
Jul 2014
7:28pm, 29 Jul 2014
15097 posts
  • 0
flanker
I replace them when the upper has too many holes to secure my foot, or when the sole has completely worn through.
Aug 2014
2:05pm, 7 Aug 2014
2678 posts
  • 0
RevBarbaraG
Found this thread just after clicking OK on my order for a new pair of Brooks Ghost 6's, ha ha.

Quite pleased with the price I found - a few quid less than I paid for my current pair, even though they are the GTX version (with a Goretex lining) which normally retails for £20 more. Probably clearing remaining stock, as they have now brought out the Ghost 7.

Anyhow.... after reading this thread, I went to look at the soles on my current Ghosts, which have done 310 miles. There is significant wear on the mid foot, just about the ball of the foot. I deduce a few things: I am predominantly a mid foot striker, and I land more heavily on my left foot - the tread on that one is just about gone. So.... despite people talking about these fantastic mileages they are getting out of their shoes, I don't feel too bad about having ordered a new pair!

Another interesting thing - I've been rotating my Ghosts with a pair of New Balance 980's, which have a lower profile and much less rugged sole. They haven't done as many miles as my Ghosts, but not much different - but there is virtually no wear on the sole. I find that surprising, since they don't look or feel anything like as chunky.

ISTR that when I bought the NB's I was told they had a lower heel drop than traditional shoes - I've checked it out, and it's 4mm. I wanted to compare with the heel drop on the Ghosts, but I can't find that info anywhere - including on the Brooks site. Any suggestions for where I might find it?
Aug 2014
9:15pm, 9 Aug 2014
904 posts
  • 0
K5 Gus
Runningwarehouse.com is great for shoe stats.

To find the Ghost 6 had to go to their Liquidation ( ie Sale ) section, they quote it as a 11mm difference ( new Ghost 7 also 11mm ) runningwarehouse.com
Aug 2014
5:00pm, 12 Aug 2014
48 posts
  • 0
idle_wilder
It does very much have to be a case of 'what works for you', which doesn't make things easy with all the conflicting advice! I tend to find I get about 6 months or so from shoes, as I can be quite heavy on my feet. I go by looking at how worn the tread is, how compacted the cushioning looks (particularly in forefoot), and the comfort factor!
Aug 2014
5:01pm, 12 Aug 2014
49 posts
  • 0
idle_wilder
And my shins tend to have a strong opinion on when the cushioning is gone in my running shoes! :)

Got something to say?

To contribute to the discussion, you need to either sign in or register as a user.

About This Thread

Maintained by Scooba Steve
acsm.org

Just seen this referenced in a recent RW - A...

Related Threads

shoes foot worn heel cushioning wear studs sole shoe running particularly
Back To Top

Close