Mar 2016
3:00pm, 28 Mar 2016
771 posts
|
mblnFERCr
Thanks GlennR. Resting HR is/was within a few beats. The parkrun HR I put down to the 'sudden' rise in effort - 1.5 miles warmup @ 9mm before hand, then off like a scalded rabbit @ 7:xx mm.
Could it be read the other way round, i.e. the half HR is depressed for the pace? Or is that all wrong?
|
Mar 2016
3:04pm, 28 Mar 2016
18,236 posts
|
GlennR
It's certainly possible, but I'd be surprised that you managed to maintain such a good pace for the duration.
|
Mar 2016
3:44pm, 28 Mar 2016
9,828 posts
|
Bazoaxe
The stats to me suggest you had a bit more to give in the early stages as it was quite consistent/low until the late push came along when it increased.
I know its not like for like, but as a comparison here are my HR stats from a week old HM PB where I was at the overall avge HR by mile 2 and it stayed in that area throughout. I do wonder though if I had a bit more to give from mile 9 when I dropped off by a beat or two. Betweeen mile 12 and 13 I did back off for a bit due to a stitch
1) 1m - 6:13(6:13/m) 163/171bpm 86cal 9.64/10.78mph 2) 1m - 6:13(6:13/m) 169/172bpm 92cal 9.65/11.5mph 3) 1m - 6:36(6:36/m) 170/173bpm 99cal 9.09/10.05mph 4) 1m - 6:26(6:26/m) 168/172bpm 93cal 9.32/10.63mph 5) 1m - 6:06(6:06/m) 167/169bpm 86cal 9.85/11.37mph 6) 1m - 6:19(6:19/m) 170/174bpm 94cal 9.5/10.82mph 7) 1m - 6:13(6:13/m) 169/172bpm 91cal 9.64/10.74mph 8) 1m - 6:30(6:30/m) 169/172bpm 97cal 9.24/10.2mph 9) 1m - 6:24(6:24/m) 168/170bpm 93cal 9.36/10.25mph 10) 1m - 6:27(6:27/m) 167/169bpm 92cal 9.31/10.17mph 11) 1m - 6:46(6:46/m) 168/170bpm 96cal 8.88/10.1mph 12) 1m - 6:31(6:31/m) 166/168bpm 90cal 9.22/10.69mph 13) 1m - 6:25(6:25/m) 167/170bpm 91cal 9.36/10.29mph 14) 0.16m - 53(5:40/m) 171/172bpm 13cal 10.6/10.87mph
|
Mar 2016
3:50pm, 28 Mar 2016
772 posts
|
mblnFERCr
Dvorak - the whole route was more or less flat. Last 5 miles I picked up a 'chatting buddy' and we whiled away the last miles in conversation which always makes the effort seem less (to me anyway).
Ulric - the beats per miles are
Parkrun: 1083 1204 1262 Half : 1068 1046 1166 1135 1115 1143 1135 1146 1174 1137 1160 1112 1151
but I'm not sure i understand what this is telling me...
|
Mar 2016
3:59pm, 28 Mar 2016
773 posts
|
mblnFERCr
That certainly looks more like a pb effort Bazoaxe I'm pretty sure I could have had a few minutes off if I'd set out more aggressively. I was using the 1:40 pacer, and losing time to them over the first few miles, as that's where I thought I was pace-wise.
|
Mar 2016
4:17pm, 28 Mar 2016
9,829 posts
|
Bazoaxe
...of course the balance is not going out too fast and then having a spectacular blow up some time before the end....
|
Mar 2016
4:17pm, 28 Mar 2016
3,394 posts
|
Huntsman
Mbin there was no way you were at race pace for the last 5 miles if you were chatting. Proper race pace is not being able to talk apart from a couple of words. Bit more to give from you I think.
|
Mar 2016
4:38pm, 28 Mar 2016
8,023 posts
|
FenlandRunner
Not sure about that Hunts, I talk to people when 'racing' a parkrun
|
Mar 2016
4:41pm, 28 Mar 2016
9,831 posts
|
Bazoaxe
You should be racing harder then FR
|
Mar 2016
4:41pm, 28 Mar 2016
8,024 posts
|
FenlandRunner
LOL Baz, sometimes 'harder' isn't faster, let it flow
|