First Ever - Richmond Park Marathon May 15th 2011 - only 300 entries allowed
15 watchers
May 2011
3:46pm, 21 May 2011
407 posts
|
TZ
Yes, mine also out by four minutes (I too was first wave).
|
May 2011
4:07pm, 21 May 2011
7,293 posts
|
paul a
Seems odd that a race wouldn't put more thought into the accuracy of and recording of finish times.
|
May 2011
4:28pm, 21 May 2011
408 posts
|
TZ
I totally agree Paul. Had they made it clear when I entered that this was their approach, I would have done Norman's Forest of Dean Marathon instead...
|
May 2011
4:53pm, 29 May 2011
336 posts
|
Left Foot
Times are up on the website now, but it's still the first (wrong) version. Bit annoyed now as I'm sure many people have been in touch with their correct time. |
May 2011
4:58pm, 29 May 2011
7,364 posts
|
paul a
Totally unprofessional and unnecessary errors.
|
May 2011
4:59pm, 29 May 2011
34,421 posts
|
plodding hippo
Oh |
May 2011
7:04pm, 29 May 2011
2,047 posts
|
run free
Ok - a small hickup. Put in the complaints and they will get it right next year if they are not too deflated by the complaints. Me and Landy got an excellent time - am gonna keep quiet |
May 2011
5:53pm, 30 May 2011
410 posts
|
TZ
RF - sorry, but I have to disagree. To run a "race" and then fail to record finishing times is a very serious issue. To then, two weeks later, not to have published any amendments just gives the impression of a lack of concern by the organisers. My post-race impression of their race is one of deflation! |
May 2011
6:03pm, 30 May 2011
7,371 posts
|
paul a
Time to move on I guess, but I just can't see what was so difficult about recording times for this. Hardly a large field, a timing clock, volunteers to record numbers and times......what could be simpler. It is also annoying that corrections have not been addressed.
|
May 2011
6:32pm, 30 May 2011
2,050 posts
|
run free
TZ - I agree with you but it took over a week to get the first draft results sorted. The second week has been folks emailing the organisers about the results to get the right results. Bank holiday and it is most likely their (organisers) families and work have reeled the guys back in, as well perhaps allowing a time frame to allow any last minute persons to send their updated times. Think if we are patient enough the new results will be posted as these are guys are runners and will understand the importance of a finishing time in their event. |
Related Threads
- World Marathon Majors - a 6 star quest Mar 2024
- London GFA Dec 2023
- London Marathon Club places Dec 2023
- London Marathon 2020 Oct 2021
- London marathon 2022 date change. Aug 2021
- VLM 2021 Feb 2021
- london marathon 2021 Ballot watch Feb 2021
- London Marathon 2020 Dec 2019
- London Marathon 2020 Ballot Results Oct 2019
- The ugly side of the London Marathon 2019 #NotInclusive May 2019