Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

East Midlands Fetch Mile challenge

2 lurkers | 20 watchers
May 2008
11:05am, 6 May 2008
191 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
sLickster
*wanders in to the discussion to ask when Fetch will allow a sub 14 second 100m time to be entered so 772 points can be claimed, before wandering back out* :-)
May 2008
11:09am, 6 May 2008
3,771 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
EvilPixie
I think we have most certainly set the standard for Fetch meets!
well done one and all!
May 2008
11:23am, 6 May 2008
1,068 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Beejay
I also entered my time for the 100 and got a massive number of ranking points........to be honest I didnt agree so I deleted the race from my race portfolio.

I have kept the 1m points tho, I think they were well earned :)
May 2008
11:41am, 6 May 2008
3,104 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
fetcheveryone
Slickster - that should be sorted now :-)
May 2008
12:03pm, 6 May 2008
1,233 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Boycie
Mr Fetch - assuming that 10.5 seconds for a 100m is equivalent to a 4 minute mile - i.e. tough to achieve - then the scaling ratio for a 100m time should be 23 - i.e. take 700 + (300 - (100m time in seconds x 23) ) would give a more accurate ranking... So a time of 13 seconds would roughly equal 700 points, which seems about right...
May 2008
12:07pm, 6 May 2008
192 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
sLickster
Thanks Fetch, although I agree with both Beejay's and Boycie's comments that the rankings for the shorter distances are way out. However, without knowing the current formula used, I will resist comment on a more appropriate one :-)
May 2008
12:08pm, 6 May 2008
193 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
sLickster
'rankings' refers to ranking points in the above post...
May 2008
12:08pm, 6 May 2008
2,909 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
jude
*fingers in ears*

677 points LA LA LA L A LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!
May 2008
12:18pm, 6 May 2008
1,234 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Boycie
The formula that fetch uses (if my understanding is correct) is that you scale everyone's performances to a one mile time, using the riegel formula (which is well dodgy ;) ) and then 700 points corresponds to a five minute mile. The riegel formula works well for long distances (5k +) but begins to get iffy below that.

By studying the equivalent performances at different distances you'll be able to work out a more accurate formula. Sadly it won't be linear...
May 2008
12:19pm, 6 May 2008
2,913 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
jude
Damn! IT WON'T BE LINEAR!

*sulks*

:)

About This Thread

Maintained by Barky
Looking at another East Mids Mile!
  • Show full description...

Related Threads

  • events
  • social

Report This Content

You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.



Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.










Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,233 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here